IgAN

  • Most common type of glomerulonephritis
  • 1.5 of 100,000 individuals per year
  • 2:1 M:F in North America, 1:1 in Asia
  • 1-3% of all cases of end stage kidney disease
  • The prevalence is highest in Asian countries - 30% of all kidney biopsies (and 45% of glomerulonephritis cases) cultural biopsy practice a factor?
  • 5% of biopsies in the United States and Europe.
  • Classic presentation: microscopic hematuria, asympomatic, picked up on screening
  • Atypical & Non-Specific presentations can be tricky: abdominal pain, hypertension, and proteinuria.
  • HSP spectrum
  • Large variability in outcomes:
    • 10-year risk of ESKD ~ 30-40% worldwide
    • 10 year risk of ESKD ~ 10% if normal eGFR at presentation
    • Risk prediction important, see below.

Secondary IgA

  • IBD, Coelic, cirhossis, chronic infection (HIV), some malignancies

Pathology

  • Abnormal glycosylation of IgA
  • Abnormal IgA is galactose-deficient and consequently recognized by anti-glycan IgG or IgA1 antibodies
  • These immune complexes deposit in mesangium causing injury

Risk Stratification

Established risk factors

  • Male sex
  • Proteinuria >1 g/d
  • Hypertension
  • Reduced GFR
  • Hyperuricemia

Back of the Envelope method

Consider:

  • Proteinuria > 1 g per day
  • HTN (>140/90 mm Hg)
  • “severe” histologic lesions on the basis of glomerular, vascular, tubular, and interstitial features.

20-year survival without RRT = 96% if no risk factors 36% with 3.

Histological methods

MEST-C

Useful for research but less useful for clinical decisions

MEST-C scoring - The Oxford Study

  • Mesangial hypercellularity; diffuse, involving greater than 50% of glomeruli
  • Endocapillary hypercellularity: any, even if limited to a single loop of a single glomerulus
  • Segmental sclerosis: any
  • Tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis: 25-50% cortex, >50% of cortex

Mesangial hypercellularity, endocapillary hypercellularity, and crescent formation are histopathologic indicators of activity, while segmental sclerosis and tubular atrophy indicate chronicity. E is worst.

Crescents added in 2019

  • C0 (no crescents)
  • C1 (crescents < 25% gloms), identifying patients at increased risk of poor outcome without immunosuppression
  • C2 (crescents >25% gloms), identifying patients at even greater risk of progression, even with immunosuppression
  • Fibrous (<10% cells and ≥90% matrix) crescents don’t count (fibrocellular are ok)

If you are C2, HRs for a (composite outcome of either ESRD or ≥50% reduction in eGFR; increased rate of eGFR decline) was of 3.26 (95% CI, 1.47 to 7.34; P=0.004) in untreated and and 2.43 (95% CI, 1.17 to 5.06) if treated with Immunosuppression. Not particularly different!

M, S crescents enhance ability to predict outcomes only in patients who had not received immunosupression. Nice NephJC

VALIGA

VALIGA

European validation of Oxford study

  • 1147 patients | 13 European countries | median follow-up of 4.7 years
  • 86% ACEi/ARB, 42% steroids/IS

MST = predict loss of renal function

If eGFR <30, MT = predict loss of renal function

If Proteinuria <0.5/day, ME = predict rise in proteinuria to 1-2g/day

As with Oxford, MST enhance ability to predict outcomes only in patients who had not received immunosupression

Prediction models

International IgA Nephropathy Network Prediction models

Parameters:

  • Age
  • Ethnicity
  • Blood pressure
  • GFR
  • Proteinuria
  • Use of renin-angiotensin system blockade
  • Use of immunosuppression
  • Pathologic variables (MEST-score)

Generalizability

  • Adult patients, no pediatric patients.

  • White, Chinese and Japanese patients only

  • Biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy only so the full models cannot be applied in patients who have not undergone biopsy.

  • Needs to be applied at the time of bx only

  • Not appropriate for Rx decisions

Calculator here

GWAS

IgA GWAS

Risk genes increase as you move West to East but ultimately only explain ~7% of overall risk.

Interesting implications for variable of “Race” in data and what it really is capturing – at times, these risk genes, but also captures range of diverse and ill-defined cultural/socioeconomic patterns.

Not entirely clear what relationship “race” has to IGAN, possibly worse outcomes in “Chinese” populations but unclear if that applies to Chinese Nationals of those with Chinese heritage in other countries. No evidence of differential treatment effects.

Treatment

  • If proteinuria, optimise long term ACE-i/ARB to max tolerated

  • Threshold for starting per KDIGO >1g/d

  • BP <130/80

STOP-IgAN

STOP-IgAN

Heavy Immunosuppression for moderate IgA disease

Inclusion:

Bx confirmed IGAN, aged 18-70, proteinuria >0.75g/d & HTN, eGFR<90

Excluded:

Secondary IGAN, rapid progression/crescents, previous immunosuppression

Endpoint:

  • Decrease in eGFR of 15 or remission (Pro/24hrs <0.2, eGFR decline <5)

6 months run in to optimise | N= (337) ->177 randomised over 3 years

The immunosuppression

  • eGFR >59 received 1g of IV methylprednisolone daily for 3 days at the start of months 1, 3 and 5; and oral prednisolone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg every other day
  • eGFR 30-59 received cyclophosphamide 1.5 mg/kg/day for 3 months, followed by azathioprine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg per day during months 4-36, plus oral prednisolone 40 mg/day, tapered to 10 mg/day, over the first 3 months of the study, 10 mg/day during months 4-6 and 7.5 mg per day during months 7-36.

Results

Immunosuppression led to

  • More remission (14 vs 4) OR 4.82 (1.43-16.30)
  • No change in eGFR decline of at least 15 (22 vs 21) OR 0.89 (0.41-1.90)

Conclusion

  • Probably not super useful in these patients (? Takes longer to demonstrate eGFR improvement?)
  • Doesn’t apply to heavy proteinuria <35g or rapid progression/crescents who probably need immunosuppression
  • 34% of patients had <0.75g proteinuria per day at six
    months, with supportive care alone. Get them on ACEi

TESTING

TESTING

Steroids in IgAN: the one that was reimagined half way through due to safety concerns

Inclusion:

Patients with IGAN >= 1g proteinuria/day, 12 week run in ACEi/ARB

Excluded:

Secondary IGAN, MCD, >50% crescents, infection, cancer

Endpoint:

40% decreased in eGFR/ESKD/death | ESKD | Death

The immunosuppression regime:

High dose: 0.6-0.8 mg/kg/d, maximum 48 mg/d, weaning by 8 mg/d/mo; n = 136

Low dose Regime: (0.4 mg/kg/day, maximum 32 mg/day) for 2 months, followed by weaning by 4 mg/day/month over 6-9 months, or matching placebo.

& PJP prophylaxis for 12 weeks (cotrim)

Results

  • N=503, 5 countries | mean age 38 | mean eGFR, 61.5 | mean proteinuria, 2.46 g/d | 98% completed trial
  • Chinese heritage well represented ~ 75% (initial funding & recruitment in China/oz)
  • 60:40 M:F
  • Methylpred full-dose HR, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.41-0.81); reduced-dose HR, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.11-0.65)
  • SAE were higher in pred obviously, but almost entirely in the high dose infections
  • Proteinuria rebound after initial dip but eGFR maintains benefit - legacy effect?

Conclusion:

Probably low dose is reasonable in high risk of progression, single regime, I wouldn’t repeat if later “flare” or retreat unless they were exceptionally tolerant of initial regime and rebiopsy showed activity and minimal sclerosis

Notes:

E1, E0 both responded to treatment, despite previous suggestions from MEST 2009

Effect was not exclusive to Chinese (questions around Stop IgA suggested their European centres were the reason for lack of efficacy – this appears not to be the case)

By the end of trial, initial drop in proteinuria has returned to baseline

  • In international cohorts there is a benefit in inducing remission with diminishing returns on duration ending around 3-4 years – i.e. There appears to be a legacy benefit to long term outcomes based on initial proteinuria reduction in international cohorts
  • In clinic, a rising proteinuria probably indicates sclerosis / conversion to DAPA-CKD like phenotype / could be a flare but who knows what to do with that. Prob not immunosuppress anyway

NEFIGAN

NEFIGAN

Oral, enteric coated Budesonide in IgA

Oral option, USA has enteric coated on patent (100k/9 months in US!)

Has less side effects due to first pass metabolism

Evidence that proteinuria reduction in phase 2, but ongoing phase 3 trials to correlate with longer term eGFR changes.

PROTECT

PROTECT

Sparsentan in IgA - prespecified interim analysis

Biopsy proven IGAN with >1g proteinuria /day.

Sparsentan 400mg vs Irbesartan 300mg

Primary Endpoint: Change from baseline to week 36 uPCR

At week 36, the geometric least squares mean percent change from baseline in urine protein–creatinine ratio was statistically significantly greater in the sparsentan group (–49·8%) than the irbesartan group (–15·1%), resulting in a between-group relative reduction of 41% (least squares mean ratio=0·59; 95% CI 0·51–0·69; p<0·0001)

SGLT2i in IgA

  • TESTING are patients in their 30s, heavy proteinuria (2.5g), eGFR in 60s.
  • STOP IgA, Proteinuria 1.5g/day (pre-MEST) – more scarred and less active bx (a lot of S1 on subsequent reanalysis of bx)
  • In contrast DAPA-CKD subgroup with IgA – 10 years older, 20mls less eGFR, proteinuria <1g/day (i.e.? burning out/scarred? very small subgroup, only 26 events in subgroup) – Placebo risk of primary outcome ~18% @ 2 years. To get this level of risk given low proteinuria – must have lots of T2 lesions and scarring.
  • Probably most appropriate to use a SGLT2i to somebody who isn’t a candidate for immunosuppression, want to augment conservative therapy
  • Immunosuppressive options in early phase | Flozins for burning out disease
  • Potential downsides: Steroids & SGLT2i -? infection risk, might mask proteinuria and confuse treatment decisions.

IgA Vasculitis

The artist formally known as HSP

  • Skin – 95%
    • a petechial or purpuric rash in dependent areas (typically the buttocks and lower legs)
    • bullae
    • oedema
    • necrosis
    • In infants, the rash may be limited to the arms or face
    • BX: leukocytoclastic vasculitis with IgA deposition in the vessels.
  • Gastrointestinal tract - 70%
  • Joints – 70-90%
  • Large joints in legs, appearing late in about 6% ( >a week post dx) – usually no chronic sequelae
  • Kidneys 40-50%, possibly more as microhematuria present in the majority of patients.
    • Identical histology to IgAN
    • 25% microscopic haematirua
    • Mild proteinuria 15%
    • CKD develops in 1-2%
    • Monitor Cr and BP for 6 months post dx
    • CKD can develop late, notably during pregnancy
  • Orchitis (in 14% of male patients)
  • central nervous system involvement rare

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis of IgA vasculitis is clinical, but in cases in which there is diagnostic uncertainty, it can be confirmed by biopsy of an affected organ.

  • International consensus guidelines require the presence of palpable purpura in addition to abdominal pain, arthritis or arthralgia, renal involvement, or compatible histopathologic evidence.

  • Elevated IgA levels are neither necessary nor sufficient for diagnosis

  • Type III immune complex diseases such as IgA vasculitis are complement-mediated, plasma complement levels are usually normal.

Management

  • IgA vasculitis is primarily managed with supportive care and monitoring for complications. IgA vasculitis is generally self-limited, with complete resolution of symptoms and no long-term sequelae in the vast majority of cases.

  • Glucocorticoids are indicated for severe symptoms, especially those involving the gastrointestinal or musculoskeletal systems.

  • A systematic review including mostly retrospective studies and three randomized, placebo-controlled trials showed that glucocorticoids increased the odds of resolution of abdominal pain within 24 hours and suggested renal benefits.

  • However, the largest randomized trial involving patients with IgA vasculitis showed no evidence that glucocorticoids prevented the development of nephropathy.

MISC

  • 19% recurrance in Tx at 10 years
  • 23% at 15 years

Tips

  • The main discriminator between IGAN and IGAV are the cutaneous petechiae or palpable purpura seen only in IgAV.Biopsy is not reliable way to distinguish.